The footage shows a big red bigfoot walking across the screen. A video analyzer on youtube found out that this video could not be a man in a suit or CGI. He made another video proving this. Watch this video here:
The major points he made is that that, the figure walks completely different from a man, it hunches over every time it walks, it has massive muscles in places humans don't have, and therefore can't be a guy in a suit. It also has a ton of trees in front of it, and these are really hard to do in CGI, so it's unlikely it's cgi.
I watched a Bigfoot documentary and another piece of footage shot in Idaho was dismissed as being a bear. This excuse by skeptics is one of the most annoying things I've ever read. The creature in the footage in question swings it's arms like a human does. Bears don't do that according to this video which shows a bear walking on it's hind legs.
Another bit of footage of a Bigfoot offers proof that the creature is real.
In his analysis, the figure walked along till it's front leg fell into a big 5 foot deep pit. It's back leg stayed up at the top of the pit, and the figure stayed upright at the same time. The analyzer tried to see if he could mimic this and failed, utterly, proving it's something a man can't do, therefore the figure is not a man in a suit, but a Bigfoot.
The dumb ass skeptics keep saying "there is no evidence Bigfoot exists". They only say that because they automatically dismiss all evidence like this as hoaxes and misinterpretations. Any evidence we bring up will be ignored by science, and even if we did get a body, they would say it's a hoax, so why bother? Most of these people claim they have never seen one in big hunting, camping trips, so therefore it can't exist, and cite the fact there have been no bodies found. But the thing is, there have been bodies found! One particularly annoying skeptic said that "it's suspicious that all these sightings occur when such poor evidence has been found!", another tried to claim that Bigfoot is a fraud, and all sightings were just hallucinations brought on by ADHD. Even that claim is dubious, because sightings seen by multiple people, would prevent that from being true, it's EXTREMELY unlikely that two people would hallucinate the same thing. On particular asshole skeptic poster on a blog tried to claim that there is a conspiracy to fake Bigfoot evidence, and that all the Bigfoot sightings were of people purposely dressing up in suits to make people believe in the "myth" of Bigfoot. It's no myth, it's real.
The following blog post, which you can read here, goes into several sightings of Bigfoot that show bigfoot burying their dead, and in some cases, bodies being recovered. If you read the long post (it's several pages long), you can see that bodies HAVE been found! It's only a matter of time before another body has been found, and yet again the skeptics will all say it's a hoax.
There have been MILLIONS of sightings of this creature and similar ones in hotspots all around the world for centuries. Skeptics assume all of these are hoaxes and misenterpretations of bears. I don't buy that. There is no way every single sighting can be a misenterpretation or hoax, at least one mut be a of a real creature unknown to science. One skeptics said "the more sightings there are the less likely the creature is real" and cited a bunk study done by a bigfoot debunker as "proof". The study said that "the more times a story is told the more fake it becomes, it starts at 50% true, and every time it's told it gets less true", one of the most stupid claims I've ever heard. It wasn't backed up by anything other than the debunkers own words. This "theory" is BS. You can't use it to "debunk" all the sightings of bigfoot, because most of these aren't being told multiple times before the account is written down, and if they do, it's not being falsified in the process over and over again each time, now is it. This whole idea, and the above mentioned "conspiracy to fake bigfoot evidence" are completely ludicrous, and ludicrous arguments are constantly being used by skeptics to debunk the paranormal.
I've just provided perfect photographic evidence to show bigfoot is a real phenomina, evidence that was not hoaxed, is not a "bear", and the skeptics will still use their "proof" to debunk this. It's sad. The proof is there. If it were anything but bigfoot, or paranormal topic related, no one would say, "it's fake!". But because the skeptics have brainwashed the population to think bigfoot is a massive fraud, that's what they think. It's due to nonsense spread in shows like monsterquest that the forum I mentioned in the last post, got it's users changed from believers to moron skeptics. 6 years ago it was 75% believers who at least thought the phenomina COULD be real. Now it's dozens of people who refuse to believe that and say "HOAX!" for the stupidest reasons.
